References
1Please contact OLYMPUS for compatibility details.
2 Fanfani F, Rossitto C, Restaino S, Ercoli A, Chiantera V, Monterossi G, Barbati G, Scambia G. How Technology Can Impact Surgeon Performance: A Randomized Trial Comparing 3-Dimensional versus 2-Dimensional Laparoscopy in Gynecology Oncology. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016 Jul-Aug;23(5):810-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.03.020. Epub 2016 Apr 1. PMID: 27046747.
3 Velayutham V, Fuks D, Nomi T, Kawaguchi Y, Gayet B. 3D visualization reduces operating time when compared to high-definition 2D in laparoscopic liver resection: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):147-53. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4174-1. Epub 2015 Mar 25. PMID: 25805241.
4 Kanaji S, Suzuki S, Harada H, Nishi M, Yamamoto M, Matsuda T, Oshikiri T, Nakamura T, Fujino Y, Tominaga M, Kakeji Y.Comparison of two- and three-dimensional display for performance of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2017 May;402(3):493-500. doi: 10.1007/s00423-017-1574-9. Epub 2017 Mar 17. PMID: 28314905.
5 SU16 3D VS. 2D-Imaging in Laparoscopic Procedures: Opportunity Costs Associated with the Reduction of Time in the Operating Room (OR) – L. Bruno, A. Zervakis, P. Reinders – DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jval.2020.08.2002
6 Padin EM, Santos RS, Fernández SG, Jimenez AB, Fernández SE, Dacosta EC, Duran AR, Artime Rial M, Dominguez SanchezI. Impact of Three-Dimensional Laparoscopy in a Bariatric Surgery Program: Influence in the Learning Curve. Obes Surg. 2017 Oct;27(10):2552-2556. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-2687-5. PMID: 28456885.
7 Blanco-Colino, R. & Espin-Basany, E. (2018). Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tech Coloproctol, 22(1), 15-23. doi:10.1007/s10151-017-1731-8
8 Arezzo, A., Bonino, M. A., Ris, F., Boni, L., Cassinotti, E., Foo, D. C. C., …Morino, M. (2020). Intraoperative use of fluorescence reduces anastomotic leak rates in rectal cancer surgery: an individual participant data analysis. Surg Endosc. 34(10), 4281-4290. doi:10.1007/s00464-020-07735-w
9 Bostrom, P., Haapamaki, M. M., Rutegard, J., Matthiessen, P. & Rutegard, M. (2019). Population-based cohort study of the impact on postoperative mortality of anastomotic leakage after anterior resection for rectal cancer. BJS Open, 3(1), 106-111. doi:10.1002/ bjs5.50106
10 Frasson, M., Flor-Lorente, B., Rodriguez, J. L., Granero-Castro, P., Hervas, D., Alvarez Rico, M. A., …Garcia-Granero, E. (2015). Risk Factors for Anastomotic Leak After Colon Resection for Cancer: Multivariate Analysis and Nomogram From a Multicentric, Prospective, National Study With 3193 Patients. Ann Surg, 262(2), 321-330. doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000000973
11 Roy, M., Dip, F., Nguyen, D., Simpfendorfer, C. H., Menzo, E. L., Szomstein, S. & Rosenthal, R. J. (2017). Fluorescent incisionless cholangiography as a teaching tool for Residents
12 Dip, F., LoMenzo, E., Sarotto, L., Phillips, E., Todeschini, H., Nahmod, M., …Rosenthal, R. J. (2019). Randomized Trial of Nearinfrared Incisionless Fluorescent Cholangiography. Ann Surg, 270(6), 992-999. doi:10.1097/SLA.0000000000003178
13 Broderick, R.C., Lee, A.M., Cheverie, J.N. et al. Fluorescent cholangiography significantly improves patient outcomes for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc (2020).
14 Van Dam DA, van Rijswijk A-S, Ankersmit M van den Heuvel B, Tuynman JB, Meijerink WJHJ. Fluorescent Imaging During Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients at Increased Risk of Bile Duct Injury. Surgical Innovation.2017;24(3):245-252. doi:10.1177/1553350617690309
15 Based on a wighted avarage, studies have shown that using NBI allows physicians to visualize lesion boundaries. NBI is not intended to replace histopathological sampling as a means of diagnosis.
16 Devices will be available upon declaration of conformity, product registration or market clearance in each country’s jurisdiction. Some devices might not be available in some areas. Pending 510(k), not available for sale in the United States.
17 Manufacturers: Olympus Surgical Technologies Europe, Olympus Winter & Ibe GmbH, Kuehnstraße 61, 22045 Hamburg, Germany, www.olympus.eu | Olympus Medical Systems Corp, 2951 Ishikawa-cho, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo 192-8507, Japan, www.olympusglobal.com | Olympus Surgical Technologies America, 800 West Park Drive, Westborough, MA 01581, U.S.A., www.medical.olympusamerica.com | Sony Corporation, 1-7-1 Konan Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-0075 Japan